This thread is meant to debunk the deranged idea that our realm is a planet floating in space.
If the so called established science can't be challenged, then it's not science, but religion.
/vx/ - Videogames and Paranormal
File (): EBB8999170B861DACE0B30BD4B4E3775-880166.jpg (859.5 KB, 1200x800, thtfx.jpeg)
File (): 5AFBC2B050DCE12E59A35BCA999CD5AD-6936214.gif (6.6 MB, 900x900, 900px-SunAnimation.gif)
2689 replies and 1400 files omitted.
>>157933
It's expensive as fuck, but I hope to one day do it.
https://www.adventure-life.com/antarctica
I'm going to stop posting on this thread now.
It's expensive as fuck, but I hope to one day do it.
https://www.adventure-life.com/antarctica
I'm going to stop posting on this thread now.
Anonymous
No.157936
>>157935
I know that grift and read the contract the passengers have to sign before jump on board. Spoiler, those small ships only visit pre-determined outer islands and never reach the antarctic wall. Also the voyages leaving Usuhaia (Argentina) are in peak summer, or January in the South.
I know that grift and read the contract the passengers have to sign before jump on board. Spoiler, those small ships only visit pre-determined outer islands and never reach the antarctic wall. Also the voyages leaving Usuhaia (Argentina) are in peak summer, or January in the South.
>>157924
>Flat earth is not peer reviewed. There's a reason to it.
A reason, yes. Reason, no. This is why the flat earth is utterly incredible. Peer review is where other scientists and practitioners get to recreate the experiment to attempt to find flaw in it, to exhaust whether there is any refutation. Flat earthers dont know the first thing about controls in experimentation, which is why they cant (and have stopped trying 'for a reason') submitting for peer review.
>There are no peers for new ideas
Good quote, I used to have that posted over my bedframe as a child. Like many things, it can be distorted from the idea that 'having a new idea makes you the frontrunner', to 'having a new idea makes it unassailable, and the idea man is now the expert'. Thats childish thinking anon.
>Flat earth is not peer reviewed. There's a reason to it.
A reason, yes. Reason, no. This is why the flat earth is utterly incredible. Peer review is where other scientists and practitioners get to recreate the experiment to attempt to find flaw in it, to exhaust whether there is any refutation. Flat earthers dont know the first thing about controls in experimentation, which is why they cant (and have stopped trying 'for a reason') submitting for peer review.
>There are no peers for new ideas
Good quote, I used to have that posted over my bedframe as a child. Like many things, it can be distorted from the idea that 'having a new idea makes you the frontrunner', to 'having a new idea makes it unassailable, and the idea man is now the expert'. Thats childish thinking anon.
Anonymous
No.157939
>>157937
Any scientistute on a payroll can recreate the experiments disproving the curvature of Earth, but they won't because they will be destroyed for even to consider such a heresy to the establishment's faith.
Did you even read this thread? Because it looks like you have no clue about what had been already posted.
Any scientistute on a payroll can recreate the experiments disproving the curvature of Earth, but they won't because they will be destroyed for even to consider such a heresy to the establishment's faith.
Did you even read this thread? Because it looks like you have no clue about what had been already posted.
File (): 7CF78BFCA84F8BE590A71985491EE68D-125755.png (122.8 KB, 833x959, wondering.png)
>>157940
>gaslighting 101
>You are not seeing what you are seeing
>You are delusional
Okay, beyond the shilling and character assassination, can you prove the existence of a curvature and space? Or is this all you have left?
>gaslighting 101
>You are not seeing what you are seeing
>You are delusional
Okay, beyond the shilling and character assassination, can you prove the existence of a curvature and space? Or is this all you have left?
>>157951
So in summary
>Flat earthers dont do peer review cuz reasons
>Youll accept evidence that passes the scientific method, which includes peer review
Ergo, you admit that Flat earth claims - which are not peer reviewed - do not pass the acceptable threshold of evidence.
So in summary
>Flat earthers dont do peer review cuz reasons
>Youll accept evidence that passes the scientific method, which includes peer review
Ergo, you admit that Flat earth claims - which are not peer reviewed - do not pass the acceptable threshold of evidence.
>>157954
Nope.
NASA heliocentric claims, on which you base your whole faith, fail the scientific method.
This thread is a monument to the truth and your hollow shilling a disgrace.
Nope.
NASA heliocentric claims, on which you base your whole faith, fail the scientific method.
This thread is a monument to the truth and your hollow shilling a disgrace.
The whole point of peer review is so that other credible (read: experienced in the field) professionals can disprove or prove a theory's validity! It is equally about making sure the person(s) conducting the experiment didnt fuck anything up so that the findings can be validated. If flat earth theories ARE valid, where is the hesitation to publish? Let me guess, cuz masons.
>>157958
Im citing that video. You cant reject peer review, and then claim to allow (peer reviewed) scientific method evidence. Your whole premise is based on non-peer-reviewed findings! That you dont comprehend that is evidence of how flimsy your premise is. Its not shilling to ask questions, nor is it shilling to observe the answers and 'evidence', find it laughably unsupportable, and then proceed to illustrate in a variety of ways how it is unsupportable.
It IS shilling to insist that one idea (yours) is correct without an overwhelming volume of evidence, including the peer review process.
Calculus. The only evidence you should need - that fulfills the criteria of peer review, an overwhelming volume of evidence, and universally congruent models - is Calculus. Somehow, I suspect you dont understand Calculus, because if you did we wouldnt be having this "conversation".
Im citing that video. You cant reject peer review, and then claim to allow (peer reviewed) scientific method evidence. Your whole premise is based on non-peer-reviewed findings! That you dont comprehend that is evidence of how flimsy your premise is. Its not shilling to ask questions, nor is it shilling to observe the answers and 'evidence', find it laughably unsupportable, and then proceed to illustrate in a variety of ways how it is unsupportable.
It IS shilling to insist that one idea (yours) is correct without an overwhelming volume of evidence, including the peer review process.
Calculus. The only evidence you should need - that fulfills the criteria of peer review, an overwhelming volume of evidence, and universally congruent models - is Calculus. Somehow, I suspect you dont understand Calculus, because if you did we wouldnt be having this "conversation".
For those just tuning in, OP is operating under the premise that Scientific peer review is NOT
>I have all this evidence of a new set of findings!
<What? That cant be right, let me see. Hmmm, seems plausible. Let me conduct my own experiments and Ill report my findings
and is INSTEAD
>I have all this evidence of a new set of findings!
<What? That cant be allowed to get out, NASA and the masons and every religion have decreed the goyim must not know
And thats just the start!
>I have all this evidence of a new set of findings!
<What? That cant be right, let me see. Hmmm, seems plausible. Let me conduct my own experiments and Ill report my findings
and is INSTEAD
>I have all this evidence of a new set of findings!
<What? That cant be allowed to get out, NASA and the masons and every religion have decreed the goyim must not know
And thats just the start!
Anonymous
No.157962
>>157959
>peer review
If the governments' scientists would step on firm science then many years ago they had debated nut flat earthers and put them in shame, but they didn't and won't.
What we see is silence from them and propagandists doing the speaking. It is very telling indeed.
>I'm citing that video
And by doing so, you are twisting
>Your whole premise is based on non-peer-reviewed findings!
So? No NASA propagandist will try to deny the zoom experiments neither the laser ones; instead they do the same than you: to ignore the evidence and double down with the globe lie.
>peer review
If the governments' scientists would step on firm science then many years ago they had debated nut flat earthers and put them in shame, but they didn't and won't.
What we see is silence from them and propagandists doing the speaking. It is very telling indeed.
>I'm citing that video
And by doing so, you are twisting
>Your whole premise is based on non-peer-reviewed findings!
So? No NASA propagandist will try to deny the zoom experiments neither the laser ones; instead they do the same than you: to ignore the evidence and double down with the globe lie.
>>157961
>For those just tuning in, OP is operating under the premise that Scientific peer review is NOT
By the way, NASA claims fail the scientific method. There is not a curvature to be seen.
>For those just tuning in, OP is operating under the premise that Scientific peer review is NOT
By the way, NASA claims fail the scientific method. There is not a curvature to be seen.
>>157963
The 'evidence' for this claim is refused to be peer reviewed, but expects to be taken as credible.
The 'evidence' for this claim is refused to be peer reviewed, but expects to be taken as credible.
>>157964
Refused by who? When? How?
It is a fucking 1,000 dollars zoom camera a refusal to be reviewed?
It is to go to the shore and shoot a laser across the water a refusal to be reviewed?
It is to launch a camera in a balloon a refusal to be reviewed?
Any of the government employees wearing a lab coat can do that if instructed, but the won't do it. The means to disprove Flat Earth are easily available but they won't do it because they can't.
Refused by who? When? How?
It is a fucking 1,000 dollars zoom camera a refusal to be reviewed?
It is to go to the shore and shoot a laser across the water a refusal to be reviewed?
It is to launch a camera in a balloon a refusal to be reviewed?
Any of the government employees wearing a lab coat can do that if instructed, but the won't do it. The means to disprove Flat Earth are easily available but they won't do it because they can't.
>>157965
What elevation was the laser and the receiver? What natural movement of the boat was caused by currents? Showing a video is not submitting for peer review. Peer review is where you identify EVERY TANGIBLE element to the experiment, document it, and indicate how the presence of each element DOESNT throw the results into astronomical (pun not intended) percentages of error. It is NOT
>Heres a video of us doing a thing. You guys claim it cant happen but we did it see?
What elevation was the laser and the receiver? What natural movement of the boat was caused by currents? Showing a video is not submitting for peer review. Peer review is where you identify EVERY TANGIBLE element to the experiment, document it, and indicate how the presence of each element DOESNT throw the results into astronomical (pun not intended) percentages of error. It is NOT
>Heres a video of us doing a thing. You guys claim it cant happen but we did it see?
>>157967
No u. That experiment doesnt prove shit. An observer cant test whether their measurements are accurate. The ONLY result one can 'conclude' is that more testing is needed.
No u. That experiment doesnt prove shit. An observer cant test whether their measurements are accurate. The ONLY result one can 'conclude' is that more testing is needed.
Anonymous
No.157969
>>157963
>There is not a curvature to be seen.
Have you tried replicating the circumstances, and accounted for all the influential factors to prove that? All you would need is to build a model of the Earth in proportion to a Medigus microcamera (Assuming that it would represent a 5'6" person and build the rest of the model accordingly) and see how it would compare in viewing results on a flat Earth model and a round Earth model.
>There is not a curvature to be seen.
Have you tried replicating the circumstances, and accounted for all the influential factors to prove that? All you would need is to build a model of the Earth in proportion to a Medigus microcamera (Assuming that it would represent a 5'6" person and build the rest of the model accordingly) and see how it would compare in viewing results on a flat Earth model and a round Earth model.
Anonymous
No.157971
File (): 163B013009FE5F3BDF427928399D283F-239338.png (233.7 KB, 333x600, yufjvh.png)
File (): D68F11AAB45EA4D17E1A850AA4F97EA5-287674.jpg (280.9 KB, 1280x720, 775ADC97-727D-4DEC-B6AE-89F5FF355BCD.jpeg)
I just had a brilliant idea, have any of you ever thought of making computer simulation models?
All the tools are already out there for free. You just need to download Blender, Unity, or Unreal; build your experiments in those environments to reflect all of the determining factors and showing the difference between the results of a flat Earth model and a round Earth model. Then, once you post your results, distribute the pack (With a checksum to validate it's originality) for others to try out the experiment in their own.
Hell, even if you're not accustom to those environments, you could still try it in mod-friendly games like Half-Life, Doom 3, and GTA.
The only actually cost is the time it takes to build the experiment.
All the tools are already out there for free. You just need to download Blender, Unity, or Unreal; build your experiments in those environments to reflect all of the determining factors and showing the difference between the results of a flat Earth model and a round Earth model. Then, once you post your results, distribute the pack (With a checksum to validate it's originality) for others to try out the experiment in their own.
Hell, even if you're not accustom to those environments, you could still try it in mod-friendly games like Half-Life, Doom 3, and GTA.
The only actually cost is the time it takes to build the experiment.
Anonymous
No.157975
>more evidence
Vector Equilibrium
Vector Equilibrium
Let me explain why I feel the shard earth theory is plausible and the flat earth theory is not.
Understand, Nasa is full of shit.
Understand, Nasa is full of shit.
>>157976
>phone buttons
Im coming at this with a professional engineering applied science (machining and fabrication of metal and lumber), AND a thoroughly tinfoil hat background. I refer to the interview between Credo Mutwa and David Icke on youtube. I find Credos story to be plausible, and the overa4ching story derived of that is that the planet experienced a cataclysm, and a giant chunk of the earth is missing. This would coincide with the passing of planet X on the 'anniversary' of the astrological alignment with the Giza plateau. Thats going to be the subject of the next post in thr History is a Lie thread, spoilers.
>phone buttons
Im coming at this with a professional engineering applied science (machining and fabrication of metal and lumber), AND a thoroughly tinfoil hat background. I refer to the interview between Credo Mutwa and David Icke on youtube. I find Credos story to be plausible, and the overa4ching story derived of that is that the planet experienced a cataclysm, and a giant chunk of the earth is missing. This would coincide with the passing of planet X on the 'anniversary' of the astrological alignment with the Giza plateau. Thats going to be the subject of the next post in thr History is a Lie thread, spoilers.
Anonymous
No.157978
>>157977
Checking my dubs.
That theory allows for the diminished curvature of the planet, while still allowing for spheroid geometry to work everywhere except the earth, as flat earth claims. The moon is a gravitational counter-weight to allow the earth to maintain a stable orbit, and thats also why we only see one side of the moon. Nazis did escape to space on spacecraft taught by the vril (nordics, theyre referred to), mars used to be fully inhabited, the solar system got fucked.
I dont contest history is a lie, Im saying flat earth is an unsatisfactory theory to explain errors in the official narrative
Checking my dubs.
That theory allows for the diminished curvature of the planet, while still allowing for spheroid geometry to work everywhere except the earth, as flat earth claims. The moon is a gravitational counter-weight to allow the earth to maintain a stable orbit, and thats also why we only see one side of the moon. Nazis did escape to space on spacecraft taught by the vril (nordics, theyre referred to), mars used to be fully inhabited, the solar system got fucked.
I dont contest history is a lie, Im saying flat earth is an unsatisfactory theory to explain errors in the official narrative
Anonymous
No.157979
Ergo, Antarctica is either a giant crater OR the border of what remains of a much larger planet that collided with the earth millennia ago, explaining the downfall from the heights of Atlantis, where we coexisted with countless alien races. They all watched it happen, and we are what is left of those who somehow survived
Excuse me, thats not accurate. Its the border of a much larger planet that WAS earth, that is now a smaller shard.
Anonymous
No.157981
But its not 'flat', thats absurd.
mic drop
mic drop
Oh yeah
>Mars
Used to be fully inhabited by humans and other races, still is by multiple races with a small contingent of human 'ambassadors' as it were, became surface uninhabitable when the cataclysm threw off its previous orbit with earth
>Mars
Used to be fully inhabited by humans and other races, still is by multiple races with a small contingent of human 'ambassadors' as it were, became surface uninhabitable when the cataclysm threw off its previous orbit with earth
>>157982
I havent been briefed or anything, I just worked it all out. Anyway, I guarantee all this shit is classified
I havent been briefed or anything, I just worked it all out. Anyway, I guarantee all this shit is classified
>>157983
>I guarantee all this shit is classified
I've seen it for myself, it's all next to the classified documents about time traveling computers who have come to collect sperm samples of 21st century men and return to the 24th century because future humans have become sterile as a result of the moon colliding with the other end of our Earth shard and releasing all of it's radiation.
>I guarantee all this shit is classified
I've seen it for myself, it's all next to the classified documents about time traveling computers who have come to collect sperm samples of 21st century men and return to the 24th century because future humans have become sterile as a result of the moon colliding with the other end of our Earth shard and releasing all of it's radiation.
Anonymous
No.157985
>>157983
This is why the theory of evolution doesnt add up, this is why the control systems are in place to maintain ignorance in the masses and allow an elite class who literally control our every move (the masons ARE involved, Ill admit that). This is why media control, financial control, locational control. This is a prison-planet in that humanity cant leave, and certain factions of alirn do do crazy spoopy shit. They also aid those who properly ask, and metaphysics is the proper way.
This is why the theory of evolution doesnt add up, this is why the control systems are in place to maintain ignorance in the masses and allow an elite class who literally control our every move (the masons ARE involved, Ill admit that). This is why media control, financial control, locational control. This is a prison-planet in that humanity cant leave, and certain factions of alirn do do crazy spoopy shit. They also aid those who properly ask, and metaphysics is the proper way.
Anonymous
No.157986
But the earth is not flat
Anonymous
No.157987
Consider the above rant the first 'official' summary-publication of my amalgamated tinfoil hat theory that includes and is corroborated by crater/shard-earth theory, and therefore isnt off topic lol
Anonymous
No.157988
>>157984
Hadnt heard that one, but it sounds plausible. Got any sauce before I dmor?
Also, the vaccine will have more to do with the sterilization of humanity than the planet strike, but yes there will be a planet strike
Hadnt heard that one, but it sounds plausible. Got any sauce before I dmor?
Also, the vaccine will have more to do with the sterilization of humanity than the planet strike, but yes there will be a planet strike
And now Ill do somethong flat earthers CANT do, Ill tell you why this matters.
Because its about to happen again. Planet x is still in its irregular yet stable orbit, and in the cosmic aftermath of its collision with the earth it now does a planetary flyby every 'so often', which explains the mud flood, and all the rest I will be going into in the history is a lie thread.
Because its about to happen again. Planet x is still in its irregular yet stable orbit, and in the cosmic aftermath of its collision with the earth it now does a planetary flyby every 'so often', which explains the mud flood, and all the rest I will be going into in the history is a lie thread.
Anonymous
No.157990
>>157989
(it mightve been the moon that collided with the earth, one cant be certain it was planet x, but one could surmise that planet x was involved)
(it mightve been the moon that collided with the earth, one cant be certain it was planet x, but one could surmise that planet x was involved)
One might even go so far as to suggest that the moon is a hollowed out planetoid/spacecraft that used to orbit planet x but was deliberately positioned to collide with the earth, but that would be silly
>>157991
>a hollowed out planetoid/spacecraft that used to orbit planet x but was deliberately positioned to collide with the earth, but that would be silly
Why? Humanity is the only species in the known universe that can saw off it's only leg, then immediately get back up and start running again. Not to mention the horniest fuckers in the galaxy. Who WOULDN'T want to annihilate us when we're the stuff of nightmares?
>a hollowed out planetoid/spacecraft that used to orbit planet x but was deliberately positioned to collide with the earth, but that would be silly
Why? Humanity is the only species in the known universe that can saw off it's only leg, then immediately get back up and start running again. Not to mention the horniest fuckers in the galaxy. Who WOULDN'T want to annihilate us when we're the stuff of nightmares?
File (): 5CA3AD465BF83FA0818D886A8941AE04-104267.jpg (101.8 KB, 1080x756, 82821062_152203802863448_6184856105714188288_n.jpg)
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-50] [51-100] [101-150] [151-200] [201-250] [251-300] [301-350] [351-400] [401-450] [451-500] [501-550] [551-600] [601-650] [651-700] [701-750] [751-800] [801-850] [851-900] [901-950] [951-1000] [1001-1050] [1051-1100] [1101-1150] [1151-1200] [1201-1250] [1251-1300] [1301-1350] [1351-1400] [1401-1450] [1451-1500] [1501-1550] [1551-1600] [1601-1650] [1651-1700] [1701-1750] [1751-1800] [1801-1850] [1851-1900] [1901-1950] [1951-2000] [2001-2050] [2051-2100] [2101-2150] [2151-2200] [2201-2250] [2251-2300] [2301-2350] [2351-2400] [2401-2450] [2451-2500] [2501-2550] [2551-2600] [2601-2650] [2651-2700] [2701-2739] [Next] [Live (last 50 replies)]
2739 replies | 1409 files | 269 UUIDs | Page 2