/sp/ - Football

>>22032
>>22029
Anyways, Nigel affairs are handled by Elway, and I do not stop him.

>>22032
>Oh but I'm done trying to make this place more appealing
I'm curious. How exactly you did it?

>>22027
>Horsefuckers are not drug-addicts, nor pedophiles, nor communists, neither homosexuals
We have all of those things too though.

>>22036
>We have all of those things too though.
Not here that I'm aware of.

>>22035
Nigger, post furry or non-furry
With respect
>>22036
This is the most important point. Its easy to get distracted by the notables. I STILL have "Kero the Wolf" memorized, and cant unsee.
Bit Kero the Wolf is one of hundreds of thousands, and among the exacting minority. Like, maybe a handful on his tier.
Not to sugarcoat, its not great that theres people like him, but it goes that way for society, and interest groups as a whole.

One would be remiss if they avoided camping, because a person who did bad things was an avid camping enthusiast. There are good people who like camping, and are arguably among the majority.
So it is with furries

>>22033
Not asking you for anything tho. In fact, it would be quite helpful if they were to stay. Let's see if it was all worth it.
>>22035
You should be more concerned about the rest of the post. Till next time.

>>22038
>B-but it is not all of them
I know where that is going.

>>22040
You do, do you? So you ARE suggesting that all horsefuckers are part and parsel to the AJ killer? He was a horsefucker, after all, and your tone suggests that distinctions are irrelevant.

>>22041
>AJ killer?
>He was a horsefucker
A brony bullied by forced non-White diversity.

>>22041
>the AJ killer
The AJ Vigilante.
/)

>>22042
That sounds like a distinction. A specific one.
But distinctions are okay when it comes to ponies,but dont exist for any other genre?

>>22044
>But distinctions are okay when it comes to ponies
There is a reason exists Ponerpics and Derpibooru. Both field different human species.

>>22045
Yes, because people are wont to deny being furries. Or rather, ppl are wont to divide their segment of furry (and attempt to rebrand under a different name) for a variety of reasons.
>ponerpics
Nigger please, thats just opportunism

But lets be honest,... you would totally wear the Luna suit,....
And if you can admit that, you can acknowledge that its not bad to want to wear a Luna suit. Why WOULDNT u wanna be best princess, if just for a moment?
Its not bad to want to wear the Luna suit.
It IS bad to want to fuck animals (except horses, apparently), children, use drugs, and lots of other bad things. Those are bad.
So, if you DO wanna wear the Luna suit, but DONT wanna have sex with obscure/illegal things,... is that a thing? Like, can you avoid over-the-top degeneracy while still accepting ponies?
Yes!
And theres countless who think the same way!
And most of them identify as furries!

>>22047
>It IS bad to want to fuck animals (except horses, apparently)
Horses are white, so it's okay to fuck them.

>>22048
*stares silently, judgingly*

>>22049
I stand by my statement.

>>22047
> It IS bad to want to fuck animals (except horses, apparently), children, use drugs, and lots of other bad things. Those are bad.
This, but unironically

I know alot of y'all are being ironic, but its very telling when the same crowd that REEEEs about degeneracy, openly endorses zoophilia. Jus sayin'

>>22054
It's not zoophilia though. Horses are white.

>>22055
I give your mental gymnastics a 7/10

>>22054
Does anypony have that edit of the orange Anon plowing Aryanne from behind and saying "I strongly disavow and condemn homosexuality"?

>>22054
>I know alot of y'all are being ironic
Do you know where you are?

>>22058
I think I have something like that. The problem is that has not been renamed to find it. Sorry.

>>22061
Based and redpilled

>>22061
/)

>>22054
We are /mlpol/: we can do BOTH.

>>22059
Do you know who you're talking to?
>>22064
No anon, you cant. In the best case, thats doublethink.

In the entirety of my interactions with horsefuckers, about 6 years total, I have met ONE unironic horsefucker.
Reiterating, of all the ppl Ive interacted with, there was ONLY one who WASNT full of shit, and honestly meant what they said (with a record to prove it) about fucking horses.
But then theres y'all. Who wanna play pretend. "If I meme it enough, Ill be based right?"
While crying about degeneracy.
And mostly 'christian' Ill wager.
Smh

>>22066
I love this opening.

>>22070
>In the entirety of my interactions with horsefuckers, about 6 years total, I have met ONE unironic horsefucker
>my interactions with horsefuckers
WTF

>>22066
You thought we’d all go fur
But hell no sir we’re pretty sure
Our mare fixation has no cure!

>>22070
>you are degenerates for fucking horses!
>you guys are full of shit and don’t fuck horses!
Pick one.

Also, horses are sexy, so it’s really not the same. And you obviously haven’t met enough horsefuckers. Did you go to MareFair?

I have made a Venn diagram that I hope will clear up this controversy once and for all.

>>22099
This is fair.

>>22099
Except thats not accurate. A better diagram would have furries encompassing horsefuckers entirely, with only the smallest crescent evading the furry bubble.
This is due to the fact that furries were objectively defined long before MLP even came out. You can criticize the overly generalized definition of furries all you want - plenty do - but that doesnt change the fact that all MLP activity - whether the individual self-identifies AS a furry - is furry in nature.

>>22101
You haven't yet clearly defined what a furry is. What counts as a furry? Is anyone who ever enjoys or appreciates a form of media that includes anthropomorphized animals a furry?

>>22102
Uhm, you mean aside from the OP?

I'll phrase differently
>>22102
>Is anyone who ever enjoys or appreciates a form of media that includes anthropomorphized animals a furry?
Technically and definitively, no. Self-identification is a necessary component.
Having SAID that, horsefuckers self-identify as part of the MLP fandom, which IS definitively furry in that it centers around/toward anthropomorphized ponies,....
So yes, all horsefuckers are furries, but some are in denial.

>>22104
Wouldn't that make Disney movies fans, Pokemon fans, and d&d players "furries"? What's the criteria? Where does it end?
>Self-identification is a necessary component.
Why does it matter with one component, but not the other? People self-identify as bronies, but don't identify bronies as furries.