Furry
noun/adjective
>One can be said to be A furry, and one can be said to DO things that are describable AS furry.
"Furry" encompasses Animals with anthropomorphic aspects, and people who are interested in animals with anthropomorphic aspects.
Things like animals using spoken language, reading/writing, holding cups with their fore-[~]hands[/~]hooves, and assorted other human-like behavior that is otherwise not associated with the native creature.
Like ponies. Specifically, My Little Pony ponies.
Yes, ponies ARE definitively furry.
And, one can like furry things without identifying AS a furry,... but....
Tl;dr ITT OP tries to divest horsefuckers from their denial of being furries
/sp/ - Football
Yea, for the Denver Broncos are Football Now and Forever
File (): AABAF51433BFEC1E2D4A9D0AAC58975E-69374.jpg (67.7 KB, 569x438, 4cr9qr.jpg)
File (): ED38594C8D05920BEA38780A4FB94305-52184.jpg (51.0 KB, 1080x560, Screenshot_20230506_112003_Google.jpg)
564 replies and 110 files omitted.
>>22203
Weird that youre cool with adult setting on furaffinity.
I know most wont get the reference, but classic
Weird that youre cool with adult setting on furaffinity.
I know most wont get the reference, but classic
Anonymous
No.22208
File (): B949CE998B57A90B0A1126C0C76C2B1A-36595.jpg (35.7 KB, 604x397, 088A16C74DF6DBC0AC1F272E31BC681B-36577.jpg)
File (): D81C788C63A6F66052D459CA81C32D3B-102185.jpg (99.8 KB, 640x803, 1569474026273-0.jpg)
File (): 164D17B24B0E6CF07966769FF4DE90C1-290320.png (283.5 KB, 1019x817, 164D17B24B0E6CF07966769FF4DE90C1-290320.png)
File (): 2CC1E2F759BEE8A4AC93BF77E739DDB0-2741190.png (2.6 MB, 995x3511, 2CC1E2F759BEE8A4AC93BF77E739DDB0-2741190.png)
File (): 4387E1D77A0C9558DDC8000D0EE5CC48-191550.png (187.1 KB, 800x600, 4387E1D77A0C9558DDC8000D0EE5CC48-191550.png)
>Reads OP
So all people should entirely totally trust NPC definitions as is got it.
>last thirty to fifty minutes
That happened I guess.
>>22108
Here's a (You) Bronco post anon.
So all people should entirely totally trust NPC definitions as is got it.
>last thirty to fifty minutes
That happened I guess.
>>22108
Here's a (You) Bronco post anon.
Anonymous
No.22211
>>22200
Even the Egyptians were just practitioners of animism that have been prevalent since the dawn of man. It's only in 1983 (after ponies were already a thing), that people said the concept of anthropomorphic animals are "furry".
Even the Egyptians were just practitioners of animism that have been prevalent since the dawn of man. It's only in 1983 (after ponies were already a thing), that people said the concept of anthropomorphic animals are "furry".
Also, nice touch with the video response bot. Totally lends credibility
Anonymous
No.22224
Anonymous
No.22225
File (): E98A1B738A2BA17A0474DB6E5DF8D78E-88683.png (86.6 KB, 2000x1000, E98A1B738A2BA17A0474DB6E5DF8D78E-88683.png)
File (): 47C9FF30ABACA30DCFCBADAB8CD63084-284905.png (278.2 KB, 600x689, 1578112354343.png)
>>22222
Erhmagherd he got trips! This completely sublimates objective reality! Ponies are saved cuz a faggot on a board made a post with numbers!
Erhmagherd he got trips! This completely sublimates objective reality! Ponies are saved cuz a faggot on a board made a post with numbers!
Anonymous
No.22227
Anonymous
No.22229
Anonymous
No.22231
Anonymous
No.22235
File (): 0F66B0544F45C5D6403376F706241483-55574.jpg (54.3 KB, 500x500, jelly_2999.jpg)
Anonymous
No.22246
File (): E74809A4A875A825D492D56C8320D687-28172.jpg (27.5 KB, 845x634, B4792E08D97E0A2C4EFA551AA22AA092-28154.jpg)
>>22236
On account of following a higher being now I have to disagree slightly and say it's divine sovereignty of the Almighty.
Who can and does use proxies to submit HIS message.
On account of following a higher being now I have to disagree slightly and say it's divine sovereignty of the Almighty.
Who can and does use proxies to submit HIS message.
File (): 281D17C322753489749CB4F99D3874A2-427062.jpg (417.1 KB, 1124x1136, Wukb4TA.jpg)
>>22249
Which word?
Castigate all you want, you know what I have said is objectively true. And still, you regail.
Any more from y'all, and your pre programmed bot (cuz notjing says "youre wrong like a prompted youtube link)?
Which word?
Castigate all you want, you know what I have said is objectively true. And still, you regail.
Any more from y'all, and your pre programmed bot (cuz notjing says "youre wrong like a prompted youtube link)?
File (): 0EB0A6643ABECCA7E419538B98404077-305725.jpg (298.6 KB, 1000x1250, 1535518.jpeg)
Anonymous
No.22253
File (): 392A17C131B5FD9B4395627CF5DE8A37-81571.jpg (79.7 KB, 962x1024, E46B3F5313179DC04B147D86486610DB-81553.jpg)
File (): B3263F7A70F4421E3D2BC5D55B4B28DE-2510366.png (2.4 MB, 1559x688, B3263F7A70F4421E3D2BC5D55B4B28DE-2510366.png)
File (): 08B614B41B5FC0222664817ADF087589-134213.png (131.1 KB, 1280x720, 1584155494863.png)
Actually congratulations on getting a thread to somewhat mimic channel type threads.
What else is missing that is desirable?
What else is missing that is desirable?
>>22226
Oh shut the fuck up, you stupid nigger.
You're sitting here refusing to engage arguments because this thread is "not the venue" for them, and getting buttrustled over YouTube links, and comparing people who disagree to troons. Now you're getting triggered over some of us in this thread having fun checking dubs like a healthy image board should? Blow it out your ass.
Oh shut the fuck up, you stupid nigger.
You're sitting here refusing to engage arguments because this thread is "not the venue" for them, and getting buttrustled over YouTube links, and comparing people who disagree to troons. Now you're getting triggered over some of us in this thread having fun checking dubs like a healthy image board should? Blow it out your ass.
>>22252
Only when you refute my points scholastically. You're all a bunch of liars (and thieves, but we'll focus on your dereliction of truth for the moment).
Only when you refute my points scholastically. You're all a bunch of liars (and thieves, but we'll focus on your dereliction of truth for the moment).
>Bots are nao allowed here
Nice precedent, I'll consider it in the future.
Nice precedent, I'll consider it in the future.
Anonymous
No.22264
>>22261
That's a dumb comparison. You can compare anything to troons if you do that kind of logical leap. What's the point then?
That's a dumb comparison. You can compare anything to troons if you do that kind of logical leap. What's the point then?
File (): 791962D4E58B9A98D771F15AFF8FFC09-64126.jpg (62.6 KB, 1010x1081, dfsz16r-b609a898-7d6f-457d-a171-e39ecb286613.jpg)
Anonymous
No.22276
File (): C93BB242D02EA1BDEDEAA1B9324C7FFD-736973.png (719.7 KB, 788x855, 522657.png)
>>22255
You point has already been refuted scholastically using your own logic. See >>22112
It's established that one group predating another has a causal relationship towards the existence of the later group. It's also established that the Ancient Egyptians were the first to raise anthropomorphization to the level of fandom. Thus, furries are an offshoot of the egyptians
You point has already been refuted scholastically using your own logic. See >>22112
It's established that one group predating another has a causal relationship towards the existence of the later group. It's also established that the Ancient Egyptians were the first to raise anthropomorphization to the level of fandom. Thus, furries are an offshoot of the egyptians
>>22263
>Multiple people are against me! It must be bots!
Imagine losing an argument to literal bots this badly
>Multiple people are against me! It must be bots!
Imagine losing an argument to literal bots this badly
>>22277
So, youre saying that because people worshipped (incl sacrifice) ppl to animal icons, that thats somehow comparable to people dressing in unrelated furry suits?
Is it the suit that makes them the same?
So, youre saying that because people worshipped (incl sacrifice) ppl to animal icons, that thats somehow comparable to people dressing in unrelated furry suits?
Is it the suit that makes them the same?
Anonymous
No.22283
File (): 2BEED59DD14DF83FBB5178B5D4B14247-960905.jpg (938.4 KB, 1920x1920, a809cb.jpg)
>>22282
Your saying that because people worship horse icons, that's somehow comparable to unrelated furry suits?
Your saying that because people worship horse icons, that's somehow comparable to unrelated furry suits?
Anonymous
No.22291
>>22290
No, Im using the defined terms. Look them up.
Furry = Person interested in anthropomorphic animals OR a genre that includes anthropomorphic animals
I didnt write the shit, but shit was written, and thats what peiple see
No, Im using the defined terms. Look them up.
Furry = Person interested in anthropomorphic animals OR a genre that includes anthropomorphic animals
I didnt write the shit, but shit was written, and thats what peiple see
>>22289
Yeah. He was even able to respond with requests for epona vids. That's not bot behavior.
He's just shitposting to trigger OP.
Yeah. He was even able to respond with requests for epona vids. That's not bot behavior.
He's just shitposting to trigger OP.
Anonymous
No.22298
Anonymous
No.22302
File (): 0B1F816510AA2342DA054318382C47F0-105653.jpg (103.2 KB, 387x350, Set_speared_Apep.jpg)
>>22282
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A99G6O721gA&pp=ygUQc28geW91cidlIHNheWluZw%3D%3D
I'm saying that the Egyptians anthropomorphized animals, made them into literal gods, and then made art of them. They are the origin of anthropomorphizing fandom, of which furries, bronies, and all others are but an offshoot.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A99G6O721gA&pp=ygUQc28geW91cidlIHNheWluZw%3D%3D
I'm saying that the Egyptians anthropomorphized animals, made them into literal gods, and then made art of them. They are the origin of anthropomorphizing fandom, of which furries, bronies, and all others are but an offshoot.
>>22292
There are no defined terms. There is no authority on deciding what a furry is or isn't. It appears in no dictionary. Your "definition" is cobbled together from wiki articles and your personal biases, and has gaping holes in it as you refuse to apply it to various spiritual practices that date back to the dawn of man.
Ponies are a fandom independent from furries. They have key differences in their depictions. They are no more furry than Egyptians are.
There are no defined terms. There is no authority on deciding what a furry is or isn't. It appears in no dictionary. Your "definition" is cobbled together from wiki articles and your personal biases, and has gaping holes in it as you refuse to apply it to various spiritual practices that date back to the dawn of man.
Ponies are a fandom independent from furries. They have key differences in their depictions. They are no more furry than Egyptians are.
[Reply] [Last 50 Posts] [Last 100 Posts] [Last 200 Posts]
You are viewing older replies. Click [View All] or [Last n Posts] to vew latest posts.
Clicking update will load all posts posted after last post on this page.
Post pagination: [Prev] [1-100] [101-200] [201-300] [301-400] [401-500] [501-600] [601-664] [Next] [Live (last 100 replies)]
664 replies | 133 files | 34 UUIDs | Page 9