Furry
noun/adjective
>One can be said to be A furry, and one can be said to DO things that are describable AS furry.
"Furry" encompasses Animals with anthropomorphic aspects, and people who are interested in animals with anthropomorphic aspects.
Things like animals using spoken language, reading/writing, holding cups with their fore-[~]hands[/~]hooves, and assorted other human-like behavior that is otherwise not associated with the native creature.
Like ponies. Specifically, My Little Pony ponies.
Yes, ponies ARE definitively furry.
And, one can like furry things without identifying AS a furry,... but....
Tl;dr ITT OP tries to divest horsefuckers from their denial of being furries
564 replies and 127 files omitted.
>>22627>Lotus.I am not Lotus.
The not regurgitates whatever it thinks is an appropriate based on freely available public sources and options of random people. Currently, the semi-dominant cultural zeitgeist on the internet is to be sensitive to the feeling of troons, and the bot, wanting to give you an answer you'd like, told you so.
However, it is (You) who asserted that pony fans must go along with the generally accepted colloquial definition of the term "furry," however, as it has been revealed, most of those sources seem to agree that "furry" is a question of self-identification.
>>22634Just as troons can self identify as wtfe
>>22635You've completely missed the point.
Did you even read the post?
>>22637Did you miss where the bot was being sensitive to horsefuckers feelings?
(not just the bot either, furscience - for all their aggregation of useful data, they too cater to feelings and inclusion)
>>22611Nobody identifies as "Abrahamic". Abrahamic is neither identity, religion or fandom. "Abrahamic" only means "things that reference Abraham".
Furry, however, is in fact a fandom. It is separate from the mere concept of anthropomorphism.
>>22638And what are we supposed to take from that? It's a bot.
>>22640So if all the sources refer to the message of self-identification, then would that mean the consensus is that furry is self-identified?
If so, wouldn't that make us compliant with the generally-accepted definition of not-furry?
>>22644As long as youre willing to agree that men can be women, sure!
>>22645You never addressed how the biological science is congruent with the social non-definition.
>>22647Because it boils down to self identity
Leave it to a christian to spam nonsense when he has no argument,....
For those not staff, this is how staff (Stix, at least) 'argues'
>>22645I do.
I don't care either way about trannies or what they call themselves. I just know a male is male and a female is female when it comes to sex. If troons want to get schizo with John Money's definition of "gender", then so be it; just leave me out of it.
So, do you agree?
>>22656Do I agree that men identifying as women is legitimate?
Absolutely not >>22587One last time, cuz this constant YT spam is,... well par for the course
>>22645No, I don't, because that's a question of biology.
You've yet to give a single scientific definition of "furry".
>>22650Are (You) saying that men and women is a question of self-identification? Last I checked, being a woman wasn't a fandom.
>>22650Since when is biology self-identity?
>>22661We can continue when you check your boy
>>22663>check your boyWhat does that even mean?
>>22665Check the staff with the YT spam
>>22666How am I supposed to check that?
Do you still think it's only Lotus arguing with you here?
>>22663>We can continue whenAre you implying you're not going to post anymore until he stops spamming? Or are you just using it as an excuse not to answer to the argument?
>>22671That's none of our business.
>>22677>implyingIt was nice that some of y'all tried to legitimately engage
>>22678I thought you were done posting until the spam stopped?
>>22680I didnt say that, I said 'pretty much yes'
As I said in another thread, I do what I want. But, as far as actual discussion, check your boy
(something something, staff will not target users, something something)
>>22681So you're just gonna keep making off-topic posts and ignore legitimate arguments while still bumping the thread?
That's basically the same as spam.
(dont worry, staff loves that theres an actual and observable increase in the post xount)
>>22688Who are you even talking to at this point? It's just three shitposters and Stix here, and you've given up on making legitimate arguments.
>>22691No, I really don't see how anything is being encouraged.
>>22690Are you pretending that this board hasnt effectively died BECAUSE of the crony largesse given by staff? That this thread (outside pruning) wont be on the overboard for fuxking ever?
>>22694It'll be on the overboard forever because you keep bumping it, and we don't have proper bump limits for some reason.
>>22693>no matter where or when, just let the posting count increaseAlex, what is "manufactured relevance"
>>22698Nobody cares about numbers.
>>22697To rub your noses in the fact that youre furries, since it bothers you so much
>>22702Where did you get the definition of the word "furry" that is so undeniable we must accept it?
>>22702We, you've allegedly given up on arguing the case, so there's little nose-rubbing to be had here.
>>22705testingFrom a variety of furry and non-furry sources
omg, has Stix finally stopped shitting the bed?Alright, lets go back then!
>>22587Heres where we left off, more or less
>>22707All the sources you gave said it was self-identified.
Is it only you who says it isn't?
>>22709Yes, because as was established, both ChatGPT and furries tend to favor people's self-identification, which then allows for men to present themselves as women. Lets take Lia whatshisfuck, the swimmer. You know the one. He is as legitimately NOT a woman as a ponyfag is legitimately NOT a furry
Here we go,... goodnight all, Ill bother you later
>>22711So why is it that the part of the source that you agree with is right, but the part of the source you disagree with is wrong?
>muh troonsTroons drink water too. That's irrelevant.
>>22711That just means your sources contradict you.
Imagine being an Appul waifu-fag who pretends to represent her virtue, while being entirely dishonest and surreptitious when called out and blasted, such that cant even make an argument and has to resort to random YT vids to try and wipe posts away.
Horsefuckers aren't furries, but they are a walking oxymoron if they adhere to right-wing politics.
>>22753That's not how that works. More posts don't wipe away posts.
Had you posted things made of more solid truths the outpouring of responses would even surprise the site as a whole.
Instead it's vain repetitions.
Without love does it even matter?
There's still time.
Don't stumble in hypocrisy, act in honesty.
>>22757>Horsefuckers aren't furriesCongratulations.
>but they are a walking oxymoron if they adhere to right-wing politics.Walking in the truth can be paradoxical to the world. Especially clown world.
But the truth is still the truth.
Core values rise above the mask of politics for that is where the mask of politics is fashioned.
>>22759Meanwhile the flat earth thread got its bump limit erased. Talk about hypocrisy.
>they are a walking oxymoron if they adhere to right-wing politics.According to the highest level truth
The Truth, The Way and The Life, all else is reflections and refractions to demonstrate truth.
A higher level truth is ideal values in varying situations.
Truth confirms the truth.
Politics is about a shadow attempting to encapsulate the whole truth.
Horsefuckers politically are as clearest glass housing a flame. The shadow not able to be in that light. What is seen is what is there.
Yet there's still glass, unseen.
Trying to confine that in any other lower level housing introduces shadows that twist and warp the internal light.
Truly, politically trying to paint everybody in the same stroke is at best a series of rule of thumbs.
Here's some.
>When mirrors that bounce the light back and also have it go through doubling inside light and outside light.>Others are also light and those doubling mirrors.>Some are smudged sometimes, and or have specific shapes....
>>22764That's the board because gaming roleplay, don't be a salty. Context matters. Because it's in the smae type of location as /vx/ all share those traits.
>>22757Horsefuckers not being furries is precisely as valid as men deciding to be women. Both ideas have equal merit
And in a stunning display of how committed discourse and such this site is, after both spamming YouTube links and flooding the catalog, this thread is bump locked.
that’s because it hit the natural bump limit, retard, learn how imageboards work
>>22769No, dumbass, for the umpteenth time, this is a flawed argument. Furries and horsefuckers are internet slang terms that don’t mean anything on their own, so membership in either group is a matter of pure self identification. Men and women are terms that have objective definitions, and membership is determined biologically. This comparison is silly, and repeating it over and over does not make it any less silly.
Total furry apologist death.
>>22777(you) just love to posture don't you?